Rubén M.Cenzano

Chartered Civil Engineer specialised in Transportation

Ingeniero de Caminos especialista en Transporte

Mercedes' driverless cars will kill pedestrians over drivers


The ethical conundrum of how A.I.-powered machines should act in life-or-death situations has received more scrutiny as driverless cars become a reality, but the car manufacturer believes that it’s safer to save the life you have greater control over.

"You could sacrifice the car. You could, but then the people you’ve saved initially, you don’t know what happens to them after that in situations that are often very complex, so you save the ones you know you can save", Christoph von Hugo, Mercedes’ manager of driver assistance systems, told Car and Driver. "If you know you can save at least one person, at least save that one. Save the one in the car".

However, Hugo went on to say that the whole discussion may become moot. Computer-driven cars will be able to react in ways that human drivers will not be able to handle. Besides, most of the time the car will prioritize not crashing in the first place.

"This moral question of whom to save: 99% of our engineering work is to prevent these situations from happening at all", Hugo said. "We are working so our cars don’t drive into situations where that could happen and [will] drive away from potential situations where those decisions have to be made".

It’s not clear whether Mercedes will run afoul of future car regulations. Germany has outlined three rules that it expects manufacturers to abide by:
1) property damage always takes precedence over personal injury, 
2) the car cannot classify people based on age and other attributes, and 
3) the manufacturer is always liable. 

As these rules are fleshed out, German officials could be forced to clarify whether manufacturers are allowed to prioritize the driver.

It must be also noted that in Germany, it is illegal to reduce human life to a value that is processed by some cost function of an algorithm. This means a driverless car which is going to crash and (potentially) kill two people, being only one person on the car, it is illegal that any algorithm decides that it is better to kill one person than two people.

On these grounds, Volvo already announced months ago that they will accept liability for self-driving car crashes.

Finally, a recent academic research found that people were in favour of minimizing trauma in general, but for maximizing vehicle occupant safety if they, themselves, were the occupant.



Powered by Blogger.

Labels

APTA BMI BRT Boston uni CHIC CILT DfT ETSC EU EVP Edinburgh uni FT GHSA HEAT HGV HOT HOV IEA INEA ITS LEZ LOS LatAm MaaS McGill uni NGO PPP PnR R&D SCOPE SUMP Swinburne uni TCRP TED TEN-T TRL UITP UK UN VMT WHO WPT WRI accessibility acs airbag airport amsterdam analysis anpr app arduino athens auckland audi australia ballasttamper bateadora battery belgium berlin beter benutten bid bratislava brazil bridge building bus bus bunching bus stop business case cable-stayed cadiz califormia camouflage canada cancun car club car sharing carpooling challenge chicago china colombia commitments commuting congestion charge connected vehicle construction consultation copenhagen crane creativeness crime crowdfunding cycling dam demolition diabetes diesel differential gear disabled disaster distance diversity dot dragados driverless driving drone dublin e-road eCall economy edinburgh edu efficiency electric vehicle emergency emergency brake energy enforcement engineering enrique dans ephemeris escalator estonia ethics europe evaporation extreme fares ferry financing finland flight floating car flooding france free software freight funding gentrification germany global debt google greece green wave guide health heavy equipment helsinki high speed hong kong hydrogen hyperloop iberoamerica ice implosion india infringement interchange intersection investment ireland isochrone israel italy ite japan junction design koolicar korea lake lane width last mile latvia lighting lithuania london los angeles low cost lyft madrid maersk line maglev megaproject melbourne microsimulation milan mirror mistake mit mobile mobility mobility plan modelling montreal nacto netherlands new materials nhtsa no car day noise nokia north america norway nutonomy nyc nz ocean on demand online learning online tools open data oregon oslo oulu parking pavement pedestrian peru petrol phantom traffic jam philadelphia platooning poland pollution probability protected intersection public transport rail railroad real time renewable energy road charging road construction roundabout rubber russia safety samsung san francisco saudi scandinavia scania schipol school science scotland seville sharing economy siemens signpost singapore skyscraper skytran slovakia smart city smart network smart parking snow south africa spain speed camera spinlister statistics stockholm stress structural steel subway sustainability sweden switzerland tallinn tax taxi tel aviv tenerife tensegrity tesla texas text and drive tfl thermodynamics time lapse tispol tokio toll road toronto traffic congestion traffic light traffic management transport planning travel tunnel turin turkey uber underground urban planning usa usdot v2i v2v viaduct vigo vision zero volvo walkup washington weigh-in-motion wellington winter wireless charging works wtf zipcar
/